CALEB WATCHES MOVIES: ARMY OF THE DEAD
29/10/2021
After a zombie outbreak in Las Vegas, a group of mercenaries take the ultimate gamble and venture into the quarantine zone in hopes of pulling off an impossible heist. Release date: 21 May 2021 (USA) Director: Zack Snyder Box office: $1 million Production company: The Stone Quarry Music by: Tom Holkenborg Edited by: Dody Dorn Make a Donation to Caleb to have your recommendation expedited and to support this channel: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme2/Cale... Follow Caleb Watches Movies on Social Media here: https://linktr.ee/calebwatchesmovies TODAY ON THE GINGER NUTS OF HORROR WEBSITE CHILDHOOD FEARS: |
But it’s the subtle reworking of the narrative that elevates Dune to epic and visionary status. Yes, the book has problems. That may come as news to some. There’s an awful lot of sand on Arrakis – let’s leave it at that. As Frank Herbert’s concept once transcended him as an author, Villeneuve’s Dune transcends the author’s shortcomings and realigns his central vision with our times. |
Release date: 21 October 2021
Director: Denis Villeneuve
Cinematography: Greig Fraser
Music by: Hans Zimmer
A film review by James Bennett
Where the previous screen version attempted to condense the source material and thus garbled its plot, Villeneuve gives Dune space to breathe, focusing on the first half of the novel (with a much-anticipated follow up film). This proves a smart move, the story unfolding through its characters rather than in weighty and inscrutable exposition.
Dune is a colonialist’s wet dream, for sure. But it seems the novel originally faced problems getting into print due to its slow pace and dense narrative, seeing several rejections before it found a home at Chilton Books, a publisher of car manuals, no less. And it’s fair to say the novel had troubled beginnings, with poor sales, hostile critics and an editor who refused to pick up the sequel, Dune Messiah, for daring to turn the white saviour narrative on its head by recasting the hero, Paul Atreides, in a flawed, even villainous light. Whether Herbert intended to support imperialism or critique it remains one of the main talking points surrounding the novel. It’s fair to say the later novels in the series invert some themes of the first book, while doubling down on others (in Heretics of Dune, for instance, the MC asserts that homosexuals are good for the priesthood, but bad for the army as it encourages men to fuck each other. Um. OK). The author raised a lot of questions, but never provided easy answers. As a result, interpretations of Dune have divided fans for decades. At the same time, that’s left Dune open to interpretation, which boosts its continued popularity and has made this latest version possible.
This potted history provides the fuel for an endlessly debateable novel that went on to enjoy major success, win Hugos and Nebulas, spawn twenty sequels, and became one of the most influential books ever. No one can deny the grandeur and scope of Dune, nor the fact that the novel has captured imaginations around the world, having been translated into dozens of languages and selling almost 20 million copies. The blend of scientific speculation with religious mystique set the template for thousands of genre novels to come. There’s an ineffable quality to the tale that keeps us coming back for more, thorny as it is, and Herbert’s contribution to the genre, inspiring countless sci fi authors to this day, is certainly worthy of respect.
So what’s the problem? The prevailing attitudes of the ‘60s loom large in its constructs, from the genetic engineering that gifts the desert planet of Arrakis its ‘messiah’, to the witch-coded Bene Gesserit who seek power via the means of shadowy concubines and wives, to the troublesome portrayal of gay-man-as-incestuous-paedophile/rapist in the shape of the obese Baron Vladimir Harkonnen (the only queer in the universe, apparently). There are reams of essays and articles about Dune that explore the novel’s more problematic facets, which I invite readers to explore.
While the ecological aspects of the novel are inarguably prescient, complex and considered, the stereotypes and biases that populate its weft are far from it. Frank Herbert was a known homophobe who had a difficult long-term relationship with his youngest son, Bruce, a photographer and activist who later died from AIDS. One can choose to separate the artist from the art, of course, but the evidence for ethnocentrism and fascist iconography is overwhelming, even in a surface reading of Dune. And it isn’t presented here for debate. Rather, for context.
It’s a context noticeably – yet unsurprisingly – lacking in several recent leading reviews, which appear to regard the film as a straight up summer blockbuster and little more. The fact is that Dune 2021 isn’t in line with previous iterations and the same old commentary doesn’t really suit it. Bear in mind that some of Herbert’s more abhorrent views – evidently, there are no racial minorities on the Arrakis of the novel and well, we’ve covered the homophobia – have been presented as ‘intelligent thought’ and ‘valid opinion’ around the globe for decades.
In 2021, it seems more painfully clear than ever that we haven’t all read the same book.
In light of that, how does one approach a modern film version of a novel like Dune, anyway? David Lynch had a go back in 1984, with a visually stunning, but confusing take, and one that added a crass disease element to the already problematic Baron – and at the height of the AIDS epidemic to boot. The film was considered a box office flop and garnered brutal reviews from Roger Egbert to the New York Times. Many regard Lynch’s opus as a cult classic regardless.
To those unfamiliar with the novel, Dune is the story of Paul Atreides (played by Timothée Chalamet, on ethereal, passionate form), the young heir to a powerful house in a multi-galactic imperium. Drawn into a feud with the depraved Baron Harkonnen (a forbidding Stellan Skarsgård), matters come to a head when House Atreides finds itself commanded to take up governance of the desert planet Arrakis (the ‘dune world’ of the title), which is the industrial mining centre for spice, a substance that enables deep space travel between the worlds. As such, spice is highly prized, and the scene is set for treachery and warfare on the planet’s surface. The political scenario takes on a numinous scope when Paul begins to suffer visions and comes to learn that the indigenous inhabitants of Arrakis, the desert-dwelling Fremen, regard him as a messianic figure, destined to bring about a galactic holy war…
Where the previous screen version attempted to condense the source material and thus garbled its plot, Villeneuve gives Dune space to breathe, focusing on the first half of the novel (with a much-anticipated follow up film). This proves a smart move, the story unfolding through its characters rather than in weighty and inscrutable exposition. No cheesy voiceover here. No ‘Here’s the science!’ bit. For once, we’re seeing through the eyes of the players involved, the youthful excitement and doubt of Paul, the cautious guidance of his father, Leto (a solid Oscar Isaac) and the anxiety and hope of his mother, the Bene Gesserit adherent and ducal concubine Lady Jessica (Rebecca Ferguson in a standout, galvanising role). Jason Mamoa and Josh Brolin provide credible macho support as Paul’s mentors Duncan Idaho and Gurney Halleck respectively. The menace is palpable in the Baron’s laconic and murderous mien. At times, Dune scales to Shakespearean heights, the cast elevating the material while the measured pace gets the gist across with bite-sized aplomb. Which brings us to Dune 2021, director Denis Villeneuve’s latest interpretation of Herbert’s benchmark novel. The bold approach certainly seems to beg an overview of the history of Dune and the socio-political background. Both swirl in the genes of this modern day version, while at the same time presenting a subtle subversion of the themes.
Most impressive of all, Villeneuve makes no attempt to moderate or play apologist for the homophobia of Dune and its cinematic predecessor. He simply erases it, a sly move that feels progressive, while falling a step shy of inclusive. Considering the classic stature and regard of the novel, one can’t help but see the fine line the director is treading, and with so much on his plate, it’s hard not to appreciate his lightness of touch.
It’s perhaps that respect which inspires Dune 2021’s more impressive change ups. The women on Arrakis possess more agency this time around and feel less bound to the patriarchal paradigm. All the same, the paradigm lingers – it’s Dune, after all – and Jessica remains a concubine, somewhat unnecessarily. There’s a timely portrayal of Imperial Planetologist Liet-Kynes in the form of Sharon Duncan-Brewster, whose apparent neutrality gives way to a thrilling and noble bid for escape under the sands. Despite that, the first half of the film is decidedly male-dominated and it takes a little while to comfortably merge with these revised elements. Chani, when she appears, isn’t presented as a living receptacle for our pale insta-messiah, however. There’s a depth and spine to her that’s both believable and refreshing.
Most impressive of all, Villeneuve makes no attempt to moderate or play apologist for the homophobia of Dune and its cinematic predecessor. He simply erases it, a sly move that feels progressive, while falling a step shy of inclusive. Considering the classic stature and regard of the novel, one can’t help but see the fine line the director is treading, and with so much on his plate, it’s hard not to appreciate his lightness of touch. On this score, it may prove tricky to criticise this version of Dune for ‘wokeness’ when the plot remains, for the most part, faithful to the book, the setting stuns and the acting is so absorbing. Unless one wants to bemoan a lack of dated and damaging stereotypes, that is.
Thematically speaking, the film refocuses the colonial thrust of the novel on one that looks to unity and indigenous empowerment. ‘Desert power’ and ‘peace’ are the repeated buzzwords that shift Duke Leto’s presence on Arrakis away from ‘the latest coloniser’ to one who respects the Fremen and wants to secure them as allies to fight the Big Bad. In this sense, Dune leaves some of its moral ambiguity behind, and there are some who may feel this excuse for imperialism doesn’t sit quite right. Either way, Dune 2021 makes no bones about the fact that House Atreides and Harkonnen are outsiders, and unwelcome ones at that, who have only a slippery grasp of their new domain and no understanding of its spiritual core. In this sense, Villeneuve comes down firmly on the side of the story not being a ‘glorification of the white saviour narrative’ (his words) and while his reading of the novel is generous (to put it politely), it works all the same, resulting in by far the best screen version of Dune to date.
In summary, and sans spoilers, Dune is bound to enthral audiences with realistic special effects, captivating drama and pulse-pounding action. On the surface, it’s a beautifully shot and well made film. But it’s the subtle reworking of the narrative that elevates Dune to epic and visionary status. Yes, the book has problems. That may come as news to some. There’s an awful lot of sand on Arrakis – let’s leave it at that. As Frank Herbert’s concept once transcended him as an author, Villeneuve’s Dune transcends the author’s shortcomings and realigns his central vision with our times.
Love it or hate it, it’s an act of reverence that – perhaps undeservedly – suggests the legacy of Herbert’s breakthrough novel will endure for decades to come.
Grade A
JAMES BENNETT

James Bennett is a British writer raised in Sussex and South Africa. His travels have furnished him with an abiding love of different cultures, history and mythology. His short fiction has appeared internationally and his debut novel CHASING EMBERS was shortlisted for Best Newcomer at the British Fantasy Awards 2017.
TODAY ON THE GINGER NUTS OF HORROR WEBSITE
THE BOYS ARE BACK IN TOWN… A YA HORROR HALLOWEEN SPECIAL
THE HEART AND SOUL OF MOVIE REVIEWS
CALEB WATCHES MOVIES: THE WICKER MAN
Release date: 1 September 2006 (USA)
Director: Neil LaBute
Adapted from: Ritual
Budget: 40 million USD
Box office: $38.8 million
Producers: Nicolas Cage, Avi Lerner, Boaz Davidson, Randall Emmett, John Thompson, Norman Golightly
Follow Caleb Watches Movies on Social Media here: https://linktr.ee/calebwatchesmovies
THE HEART AND SOUL OF HORROR MOVIE REVIEWS
CALEB WATCHES MOVIES: BAD CANDY
On Halloween night in New Salem, Mass., disc jockeys Chilly Billy and Paul tell a twisted anthology of terrifying local myths that lead to a grim end for small-town residents. Release date: 31 October 2020 (United Kingdom) Directors: Scott B. Hansen, Desiree Connell Editor: Scott B. Hansen Production companies: Digital Thunderdome; Black Triad Entertainment |
Follow Caleb Watches Movies on Social Media here: https://linktr.ee/calebwatchesmovies
TODAY ON THE GINGER NUTS OF HORROR WEBSITE
FROM BEYOND AT 35: MADNESS, MASOCHISM, AND MORE, MORE, MORE BY MARISA MERCURIO
THE HEART AND SOUL OF HORROR MOVIE REVIEWS
Lean, mean and psychologically keen, Knocking is a solid debut feature for Kempff anchored by a volatile performance by Cecilia Milocco. Horror fiends may find the implicit nature of the proceedings a bit lacking (aka not enough gore), but the craftsmanship more than makes up for it. In other words, this one is worth a watch. |
A woman leaves a psychiatric ward after a nervous breakdown, only to start hearing mysterious knocking sounds in her apartment.
Director: Frida Kempff
Writers: Emma Broström, based on the novel by Johan Theorin
Starring: Cecilia Milocco, Albin Grenholm, Ville Virtanen
Initial Reaction
K. Knocking follows Molly (Cecilia Milocco) after her release from a psychiatric treatment facility. She moves into an apartment and readjusts to normal life. There’s a hint of some tragedy in her past regarding a former lover, but it’s never spelled out (which is a good thing). She seems to be doing well with the transition when she begins to hear a knocking from the apartment above her and it seems no one else in the building hears it. This raises the question of Molly’s psychological well being, which the film plays with from then on. I love these kinds of psychological thrillers because the questioning of whether or not what’s happening is real or not is a fertile sandbox for filmmaking.
Molly descends into a kind of madness trying to decipher the origin of the knocking and confront it. The film recalls the best of Polanski’s apartment horror films (Repulsion, Rosemary’s Baby and The Tenant). A protagonist, more or less confined to a single location, slipping into isolation and madness.
Cecilia Milocco carries the film with a natural presence and vulnerability that immediately draws you in and makes you care and worry for her. It’s a standout performance. Frida Kempff’s direction utilizes the limitations of the story and budget to create a highly charged sensory experience of Molly’s subjective state. The performances and direction make the small scale feel like a strength rather than a weakness. It’s one of the best made psychological horror films I’ve seen in a long time.
Response
J. If you know going in what subgenre you’re gonna get, and are a fan of the aforementioned Polanski stuff, you’ll definitely appreciate this one.
Bloodhound’s average score: 4 out of 5
Follow them at
https://www.bloodhoundpix.com/
https://www.twitter.com/BloodhoundPix
https://www.facebook.com/BloodhoundPix/
https:/www.instagram.com/bloodhoundpix/
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIGwNALil0m1XXfWN8tfGvg
TODAY ON THE GINGER NUTS OF HORROR WEBSITE
THE HORROR OF MY LIFE BY R.C. HAUSEN
REMEMBERING SOME TRULY EPIC EXPLORATION HORROR MOVIES
THE HEART AND SOUL OF HORROR MOVIE REVIEWS
If for some reason you’re looking for a salacious warts-and-all account that exposes the seedy side of a horror legend, you’ll be disappointed. Smoke and Mirrors isn’t a hard-hitting exposé or even an especially groundbreaking film; it’s a love letter to a man whose passion for gruesome fun has inspired thousands and touched millions. |
A film review by Sam Kurd
Filmmaker Jason Baker examines the life and career of Tom Savini -- one of Hollywood's premier makeup and special effects artists.
Director: Jason Baker
Producer: Jason Baker
Cinematography: Mitch Cleaver
Through a mixture of archive footage, old photographs and interviews with horror luminaries and the man himself, we’re treated to an overview of his life story from birth to the present day. And when I say luminaries, I mean it: interviewees include Greg Nicotero, Robert Rodriguez, Tony Todd, Bill Moseley, George Romero, Sid Haig and Alice frickin’ Cooper.
We learn about the unique mix of early influences that creates a mind like Savini’s. Growing up poor helped make him resourceful, but being surrounded by older siblings (the youngest was 15 years older than him!) meant a constant and loving support network in which he could grow. Fed on steady diet of monster movies, it wasn’t until he saw Man of a Thousand Faces that he had that lightning bolt realisation that changed horror cinema: someone makes these monsters,,, and if they could do it, so could he! Armed with a steady supply of makeup, issues of Famous Monsters of Filmland magazine and his own natural charm and irreverence, from then on there was no stopping him.
It’s fascinating to realise the difference in horror effects before Tom Savini came along. A lot of the 70s splatter flicks have blood and gore effects that haven’t ages especially well, with blood that looks like paint and other shortcomings. Savini raised the bar, and with that came a level of realism previously unknown and an era of gory films & creature features that stand the test of time.
It wasn’t an easy road from that poor kid with store-bought makeup to running his own effects academy, but it certainly makes for an interesting story! I’ve never read up on Tom Savini, so I’m afraid I couldn’t tell you how fresh and original it may be. It’s all new to me, and I enjoyed learning about where he came from and what makes him tick. I like that he considers himself a magician, because he’s in the business of creating illusions. All film-makers are in that business, and makeup departments are the ones who take it most literally!
One interesting and fun technique that director Jason Baker uses to keep things visually interesting is throwing in the occasional animated sequence to reflect the anecdote being recounted. My favourite of these was the terrifying experience Savini had during his time in the Vietnam War, which is capped off by a hilarious reveal that just perfectly sums up how absurd war can be. Well, that and the animated storyboard sequence that runs as Savini describes the original ending for his Night of the Living Dead – I wish he’d been able to run with that one, as it sounds much more striking and satisfying!
Baker is not an experienced documentarian, coming instead from a background in WWE art direction and, naturally, makeup effects. He treats his subject with reverence, which is pretty understandable as he’s Savini’s assistant and Savini seems like a really awesome boss to work for. By all accounts Tom Savini is a pussycat and a genuinely lovely man. He’s always came across that way, and that’s the overwhelming impression from all the interviewees: they praise his passion and creativity, but they’re most keen to impress on you that he’s just an all-round great dude.
If for some reason you’re looking for a salacious warts-and-all account that exposes the seedy side of a horror legend, you’ll be disappointed. Smoke and Mirrors isn’t a hard-hitting exposé or even an especially groundbreaking film; it’s a love letter to a man whose passion for gruesome fun has inspired thousands and touched millions.
It’d make a great double-bill with 2011’s Nightmare Factory!
TODAY ON THE GINGER NUTS OF HORROR WEBSITE
BOOK REVIEW -DEAD RELATIVES BY LUCIE MCKNIGHT HARDY
THE CURSE OF NOSTALGIA? BY STEVEN SAVILE
THE HEART AND SOUL OF HORROR MOVIE REVIEWS
Weeeeelll, it’s okay. While it is fun in places and suitably anthologyist (yes, I have just made up a word) it didn’t really bring anything new to the game. It has a nice set up and framing device in Paul and Chilly Billy, but I don’t think it capitalised on them as much as it could/should have done. |
Written by Desiree Connell (story by), Scott B. Hansen (story by) and Thacker Hoffman (short story)
Directed by Desiree Connell and Scott B. Hansen
Review by: Mark Walker
Warning – there may be a couple of minor spoilers for BAD CANDY in this review
Well this may well be the perfect treat to review as we head into the Season of the Witch/Ghoul/Ghost/Goblin/Demon Clown/Zombie/Bastard who puts razor blades in sweets for Halloween. Bad Candy is an anthology of half a dozen or so short horror stories, linked together by Chilly Billy and his mate Paul, as they keep their listeners happy at Halloween, broadcasting on frequency 66.6!
And who doesn’t like a good horror anthology for Halloween?
I know I do.
Ever since seeing Creepshow as a kid, I have loved an anthology and Bad Candy continues a tradition started (possibly, don’t quote me) by Dead of Night in 1945 and handed down through the generations via classics like Dr Terror’s House of Horrors, Creepshow, Cat’s Eye, Tales from the Darkside, V/H/S and the ABCs of Death to name but a few.
So how does Bad Candy stack up against the best?
Weeeeelll, it’s okay. While it is fun in places and suitably anthologyist (yes, I have just made up a word) it didn’t really bring anything new to the game. It has a nice set up and framing device in Paul and Chilly Billy, but I don’t think it capitalised on them as much as it could/should have done.
The film follows a radio broadcast from Chilly Billy (Corey Taylor) and Paul (Zack Galligan) as they recount spooky tales based on local events that may, or may not be true; some of them might even be happening as they broadcast. This framing device provides the through line for the film alongside the Bad Candy Demon Clown who pops in and out of the stories, sometimes doing something and sometimes not. To be honest, it is not always clear why he (she?) is there or what his overall purpose is. In the first segment he punishes an annoying brat and “collects” him, but we don’t see this repeated, so I wasn’t sure what that was really all about. This could have been an interesting theme to play with throughout the film as he punished various arseholes, but the character felt a bit wasted, considering how prominent he is on the poster.
Interestingly, the stories themselves are not all stand-alone. As well as the link segments that take us back to the radio station, there are connections between the tales such as a Halloween party that features in three of the segments and a few recurring characters. This was a nice touch, and I liked the way this all linked up and connected back to the Radio Station. The final tale is firmly linked to Paul and Chilly Billy and reflects a common revenge theme; Paul and Chilly are not safe from the malevolent forces that walk this Halloween eve!
Despite this, I didn’t think the film held up that well as a whole. The stories are generally fun and creepy, but I did have a few issues. One of the main problems was with a couple of the female characters. In one segment, a lonely woman seems to get (mortally) punished for having sexual fantasies about the dead – hey, you know, it’s a bit out there, but not really up there with putting razor blades in cupcakes. A later segment, which I thought was a great idea, has Army vets punishing the dregs of society with their demon pal. Their victims include a sex-worker who seems to get punished alongside thugs, arseholes, and drug dealers, just because she is a sex-worker. It felt a little unbalanced to me.
Bad Candy includes some decent practical effects and, although not excessively gory, there is enough to keep gore hounds happy. However, there was a reliance on digital effects from time to time with some fairly poor-quality blood spurts which were quite a distraction.
Bad Candy isn’t a bad film. It kept me entertained and I only found myself checking my watch once during the run time. I just found it lacking in a few places especially as it holds no real surprises for any fans of the horror anthology. Having said that, perhaps part of the appeal of the Anthology film is sort of knowing what you are going to get? But that is a whole different debate! And Anthologies are always going to have a harder time as their very nature makes it difficult to please everyone, all of the time. I also wanted Paul and Chilly Billy to have been utilised a little more. This is Zach Galligan for crying out loud! Billy Peltzer himself! I am not sure he says anything until at least half-way through the movie. Bearing in mind how things turn out, I feel his character and story could have done more and been developed further.
I had a quick look on IMDB as I was finishing this review and it is currently rated at 3.8. Personally, I think that’s harsh and I would push this to a 5 as it has lots of promise but doesn’t quite deliver. I wanted to love Bad Candy, but it wasn’t quite there for me and didn’t provide quite as much fun as some other similar films. Having said that, if you are a fan of horror anthologies this will do you fine, nestled between a rewatch of Creepshow and V/H/S, for example, as part of a schlocky Halloween marathon. Get a couple of beers inside you (or whatever your poison) and enjoy it for what it is.
the heart and soul of horror movie reviews
Archives
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
October 2014
May 2014