• HOME
  • CONTACT / FEATURE
  • FEATURES
  • FICTION REVIEWS
  • FILM REVIEWS
  • INTERVIEWS
  • YOUNG BLOOD
  • MY LIFE IN HORROR
  • FILM GUTTER
  • ARCHIVES
    • SPLASHES OF DARKNESS
    • THE MASTERS OF HORROR
    • THE DEVL'S MUSIC
    • HORROR BOOK REVIEWS
    • Challenge Kayleigh
    • ALICE IN SUMMERLAND
    • 13 FOR HALLOWEEN
    • FILMS THAT MATTER
    • BOOKS THAT MATTER
    • THE SCARLET GOSPELS
GINGER NUTS OF HORROR
  • HOME
  • CONTACT / FEATURE
  • FEATURES
  • FICTION REVIEWS
  • FILM REVIEWS
  • INTERVIEWS
  • YOUNG BLOOD
  • MY LIFE IN HORROR
  • FILM GUTTER
  • ARCHIVES
    • SPLASHES OF DARKNESS
    • THE MASTERS OF HORROR
    • THE DEVL'S MUSIC
    • HORROR BOOK REVIEWS
    • Challenge Kayleigh
    • ALICE IN SUMMERLAND
    • 13 FOR HALLOWEEN
    • FILMS THAT MATTER
    • BOOKS THAT MATTER
    • THE SCARLET GOSPELS
GINGER NUTS OF HORROR

THE HELLBOUND HEART : THE PATH TO THE SCARLET GOSPELS PART 3

15/5/2015
WARNING: This series contains HUGE spoilers, and is designed as a discussion for people familiar with the source text. I do not wish to spoil your enjoyment of The Hellbound Heart, so please read it before reading this. Thanks. 
the hellbound heart scarlet gospels review
THE HELLBOUND HEART

So I had read this one before, albeit at least fifteen years ago, mainly as a function of having seen the movie and being curious about the source material, and yet I've found this essay to be hands down the toughest one to write so far.

Because of the movie.

See, I've seen Hellraiser a lot of times. And unlike some people, I still think it's pretty awesome. But it makes reading this novella a very strange experience. I mean, it's different, in many crucial respects, from the name of the brother (Rory instead of Larry), to the fact that Kirsty is not Larry's Rory's daughter from his first marriage but his friend (and from her side, fairly clearly an unrequited lover), to the physical appearances of the Cenobites... the list goes on. And the problem for me, as the above makes clear, is that the movie is my primary frame of reference, and so I spent much of the book noting the differences rather than managing to engage with the story purely on its own terms. Added to my misery is the fact that on occasion, the two pieces do mirror so closely that I had a weird doubling effect in my mind, like reading the novelization of the film.
Anyhow. I'm going to do my best not to bore you with that version of the essay, but if some bleed-through does occur, please accept my apologies. I'm trying.

Of course, there's a way in which bleed-through is an entirely appropriate image, because bleed-through and blood is at the core of what The Hellbound Heart is all about. We start with Frank, burned out on the pleasures of the flesh, trying to open a puzzle box he's been assured will open the gates to untold, unimagined pleasures. I enjoyed the glimpses of the ritual preparations, including the offerings that Frank has been assured will put him in good favour with the beings he summons. It's absolutely vintage Barker too in that this is a tale of hidden realms, rubbing up against our own. It reminded me far more of the epic work of Weaveworld and Imajica (in subject if not in scale) than the stories have so far.

There's an absolutely superb sequence, after Frank has opened the box and agreed to go with the Cenobites, where his senses are sent into overdrive; suddenly, he can hear the sound of dust motes pattering against his skin, his clothes become unbearable, he's forced to close his eyes, the intensity of the sensory input simply too much. It's vivid, unsettling stuff, and threatening even before his ultimate fate is revealed. There's a moment when his memories of women past causes him to masturbate. It's a classic Barker moment in and of itself (what King in 'On Writing' talks about  as 'not looking away')  but cleverly, it serves double duty as the method by which Frank can gain egress back into this world later – a physical remnant. I found this storytelling exciting for two reasons: one is that it shows just how tight the story is woven, how much Barker is making every word, every scene count  (that, at least, has continued form the short stories I've read to date) and two, because of the powerful, elemental symbolism at work. Spilt blood, spilt seed, that between them can grant the power to move between worlds.

The characters are similarly drawn with a ruthless efficiency. We are simply told that Julia is beautiful, and that Kirsty is not (or at least does not believe herself to be). Rory is interesting, in that we get almost no physical description at all, only the very different perceptions from the two women in his life. The sparseness here is so stark that it almost becomes an exercise in caricature – the principles all feel almost  archetypes rather than real people, characteristics defining personality and even fate (with the notable exception of Kirsty, who is set up as a classic victim, but whose subversion of that role is ultimately for me one of the triumphs of the story, albeit an understated one). There's a way in which it makes sense – the story is at it's heart a melodrama, a classic tragedy, though containing some impressively imaginative supernatural elements – still, in the context of this read through, I felt like it was almost too sparse, the characters too vague.

Tellingly, we get far more information about Frank and the Cenobites. It's still the case that more is implied than outright stated, but it felt to me like Barker's earlier gifts for deft visualisation were back in force – he gave me just enough words of description to set my imagination to work. The Cenobites are horrific and terrifying, elemental. Frank is... Frank is interesting, actually. Amazingly, he is kind of sympathetic, because the situation he's trying to escape is clearly far worse than anyone should have to endure. At the same time, he's irredeemable – cruel, utterly indifferent to the suffering of others, utterly selfish and driven by his own whims – a petty sadist, next to the Cenobites, but still, you do feel like they belong to each other. When Kirsty accidentally summons them, then makes the deal to trade Frank in for her own freedom, it's a deeply emotionally satisfying moment, and the tension of seeing if that promise can be fulfilled, or if Kirsty will revert to being that victim she's seemed destined to play from the off, I found to be genuinely exciting.

I enjoyed The Hellbound Heart, but it definitely felt like a transition piece – there's archetypes here, but missing a lot of the deft characterisation that typified similar approaches to character in the early stories. Similarly, the epic horror fantasy elements here take centre stage, but are not yet fully formed or developed. Clearly the Cenobites and The Order of the Gash are brilliantly disturbing creations, and that notion of worlds of almost unfathomable cruelty and terror separated from ours by only thin vale is a compelling one, but in service to this story, these ideas don't get room to be fully explored. It's an exciting mythos, but it's merely hinted at here, leaving much of the work to the readers imagination – no bad thing of course, but knowing what Barker can do with such ingredients when working on a bigger canvas, I did find myself hungry for more.

Which is handy. Because now, The Great and Secret Show beckons. See you on the other side...

KIT POWER 


FOLLOW THE LINKS BELOW FOR MORE ENTRIES IN OUR SCARLET GOSPELS SPECIAL 

THE LAST ILLUSION : THE PATH TO THE SCARLET GOSPELS PART 1

THE LOST SOULS  : THE PATH TO THE SCARLET GOSPELS PART 2

THE GREAT AND SECRET SHOW : THE PATH TO THE SCARLET GOSPELS PART 4

Paul M. Feeney
15/5/2015 04:03:24

Interesting. I read this towards the end of last year and had a completely different take on it. I too, could not help see images from the film (a film I love and still think is an amazing achievement), but I didn't feel the story suffered because to me, the narrative of the novella was essentially Julia's story. She's a far more central and sympathetic character in the book than the film. I also found it incredibly well written and beautiful, almost the purest essence of what makes/made Barker's prose so wonderful and beautiful, even when describing 'ugly' things. For me, it's near perfect, more so than when I first read it.

Paul Flewitt
15/5/2015 06:53:00

I think that Hellbound Heart is a lesson in brevity. Yes, Clive can do the epic very well, he can create whole new worlds and theologies over the space of 100k words... here he proves he can do it in around 50k too. Even though this is a short novella, I don't feel that anything was left out and that this was the story he wanted to tell. The Cenobites are not central, they are merely a mirror held up to human depravity. The interplay between the characters is very well executed and gives a far deeper understanding of their situation than you get in the film. Last time I read this, it was done in just a few hours, so its a quick and easy, yet satisfying journey. Not one of my favourites by Barker by any stretch of the imagination, but a great "quick fix" for when you don't have time for one of the epics. Can't wait for your take on Great and Secret Show.

Kit Power link
21/5/2015 08:20:26

Thnaks both for your comments.

Mr. Feeney: I would very much like to read your take on this novella. I didn't find Julia to be especially sympathetic in this, but to be honest I didn't really connect with any of the characters - to me, they all felt to broad, and defined by characteristics rather than rounded people. Woulds genuinely love to read your thoughts on the book.

Mr. Flewitt: I agree regarding brevity - one of the revelations of this little journey for me is just how good Barker is at the short form, and I'm looking forward to going back to The Books Of Blood and experiencing those collections for the first time.And to be clear, I don't think The Hellbound Heart is remotely bad.Again, though, I just didn't get that deep sense of character that is so prevalent in his other work. I like the book version of Kirstie, and her journey, a lot more in the book, and it's a shame they didn't have the courage to play that part of the story in the film, quite honestly - but again, I just didn't quite connect with any of the characters in this one.

Paul M. Feeney
21/5/2015 08:38:38

I think the issue of character development can be a tricky one. I didn't find them to be thin, broad strokes at all, but then I might have been meeting Barker halfway, as it were. As far as I was concerned, the story was Julia's; it was a type of kitchen sink drama (I hesitate to use words like melodrama and soap opera, because I don't think these stories are. To me, those descriptions are flat and derogatory), not a million miles away from a Ken Loach film, that just happens to crossover (albeit briefly) into the realms of the grotesque and fantastic. But the book isn't really about that; it's about emotions, it's about dark hearts, it's about pain, it's about how far someone - and not just Frank - will go to reach their ultimate desire, regardless of what it costs them. The Cenobites are merely a mirror for these emotions. But I didn't dislike Julia at all; she makes some bad choices, but it doesn't make her a bad person as such and that's what elevates it above melodrama. It's more complex than that and something I've been thinking about a lot, lately; the idea that we are not the sole sum of our actions and choices. I found this when I worked in the prison, and I find it more and more everyday when some people seem hysterically (not the funny kind) intent on reducing everyone to mere labels.

Kit Power link
22/5/2015 07:48:49

Hey Paul,

That's a really interesting take, and one I hadn't considered. I guess I didn't read the story as being Julia's per se - thinking about it, I'm not sure I thought about the book in those terms at all, which is interesting. That feels like one of the ways this is a transition piece, actually - the early D'Amour stores were very clearly D'Amour stories, whereas GaSS onward are just as clearly ensemble pieces with many vibrant protagonists. THH, on the other hand, feels somewhere in the middle for me - it's a small cast, to be sure, but I think you could make a case for Julia, Kirsty, or even Frank as being the focus of the tale. It certainly didn't feel to me like the book 'picked a side' in that sense, so it's really cool to read that someone else had a different perspective.

For clarification (not that you were saying otherwise) I wasn't using melodrama in a pejorative sense, but purely as a descriptor. I see melodrama as a genre, and firmly believe there is good and bad melodrama, as there is good and bad horror, romance, sci-fi, etc. etc. (though of course any of those categories can also be melodrama, so maybe it's not a genre so much as a stylistic choice). I share your personal distaste for the term soap opera though, and also agree that kitchen sink drama is a fine term, and also applies to THH usefully (though I’m not sure it’s always interchangeable with melodrama).

For that reason, I'm not sure I agree that Julia's behaviours or complexity do 'raise her above melodrama' so much as make the book good melodrama, because I don't see melodrama and complex characterization as opposed forces. Your talk about Julia's likability is similarly interesting to me, because I think it throws into relief a key component of why this story simply didn't grab me the way the others did, and that is that I didn’t find any of the characters especially likable. Rory is kind of an oaf, Frank just a creature of pure Id, and Kirstie just so hopeless, so self-victimizing. Similarly, Julia just seemed... cold? Distant?

Thinking about it more, maybe it's just the selfishness of everyone concerned that I find so charmless. Not that I need charming characters (see my entry on The Wasp Factory) but in the instance of this book, I think having nobody to really root for (except arguably Kirsty, once she hatches her plan, which as I noted above was a really cool moment) maybe was part of my problem.

In that regard, I much prefer Julia's arc in the two movies than in the novella (though I prefer the novella version of Kirstie).

Anyway, thanks again for the discussion - and again, would love to read your Hellbound Heart post, if the mood ever takes you.

Paul M. Feeney
23/5/2015 02:42:51

We shall see - I might write the article one day (probably after another re-read :-P ).

I think what you say there, about having no one to 'root for'; that might be the crux of our different responses. I don't really feel that need when I read (or watch a film). I take the work on its own merits, respond to it, then try to figure out (in my ham-fisted way) why I liked/didn't like it, and all the shades in between those two. Often, it's a form of finding reasons why I reacted in a particular way after the fact. I find it easier to say why I disliked something, than why I liked it.

AS for the melodrama thing; I think because it's been so often used as a negative descriptor for works without substance, that I always shy away form its use towards things I feel are a bit deeper, a bit more complex. This quote from Wikipedia...

"The term melodrama is often used pejoratively,[1] to suggest that the work to which the term is applied lacks sophistication or subtlety. By extension, language or behaviour which resembles melodrama is often called melodramatic; this usage is nearly always pejorative."

Just how I am. I'd be hard-pressed to think of anything I could consider good melodrama. To me, soap opera IS melodrama. Stephen Donaldson influenced my thinking in this way when he said that melodrama has characters that are mostly unchanged by the end of the story; drama has characters who exchange roles by the end. I like that way of thinking.

Générateur pièces FIFA 16 gratuit link
9/1/2016 21:59:00

I will comeback and read all the other articles you posted. Keep posting like this. When you feel exhausted, You can watch movies to get some entertainment.

comment pirater snapchat link
9/1/2016 21:59:47

When you feel exhausted, You can watch movies to get some entertainment. You can use this app on Android/iOS. Here is the direct download link to get latest movies on Android smartphones.

8 ball pool free coins link
9/1/2016 22:00:44

Excellent read, Positive site, where did u come up with the information on this posting?I have read a few of the articles on your website now, and I really like your style.


Comments are closed.

    RSS Feed

    Picture
https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmybook.to%2Fdarkandlonelywater%3Ffbclid%3DIwAR1f9y1sr9kcIJyMhYqcFxqB6Cli4rZgfK51zja2Jaj6t62LFlKq-KzWKM8&h=AT0xU_MRoj0eOPAHuX5qasqYqb7vOj4TCfqarfJ7LCaFMS2AhU5E4FVfbtBAIg_dd5L96daFa00eim8KbVHfZe9KXoh-Y7wUeoWNYAEyzzSQ7gY32KxxcOkQdfU2xtPirmNbE33ocPAvPSJJcKcTrQ7j-hg
Picture