|
RABID GRANNIES (1988) Dir. Emmanuel Kervyn, 89 mins We’re back again for the second instalment of Tro-March, and we kicked off rather impressively with the wild but tremendously fun Killer Condom. Can Tro-March continue at this sort of lofty standard, or have we rather set ourselves up for a fall?
The short answer is yes. Yes, we have. Today’s offering has no less great a title, and once I get the ball rolling I did recall having watched this movie some years back, rented on an honest to goodness VHS while I was at University. This was back in the day when it was 5 videos for 5 pound for a week – heady days for those of you with a long enough memory. If I remember right, it featured as part of a horror movie all-nighter, which might explain why I could call some bits to mind but not others. I’m sure even the most hardened of all-nighters-goers has a little nod off somewhere along the way. Unfortunately the title is absolutely the best thing about Rabid Grannies – after the title card it’s all rather downhill. Rabid Grannies is the story of a family of grasping, clutching types of all stripes who attend a 92nd birthday party for the grande dames of the family. The familial connections were never totally clear to me, but rest assured everyone feels they have some sort of claim to a juicy inheritance, which is the sole reason they’ve attended. There’s about half an hour of setting them up, but it’s largely done in less time than that and you could have made this shorter on that alone. We also see a little of the staff at the house, and I have a sense these opening moments are meant to make us care something about their fate. I don’t think you’re meant to root for them, more rejoice in them getting killed off one by one, but it didn’t even elicit that from me as an emotional response. It was just hard to care about anything all told. Anyway, it’s at this 30 minute or so mark that a mysterious gift gets dropped off, and when the grannies open it up they turn… well, rabid. It’s not rabid strictly, more demonically possessed, but they start by swiftly swallowing up one of their guests, and the remaining runtime is a sort of frantic chase through the vast house (which in reality is a castle somewhere in Belgium) as the family tries to escape the vengeful nature of the possessed matriarchs. In fact, speaking of matriarchs, it occurred to me that the movie has all but the same plot as The Matriarch – which I honestly far preferred. Maybe that comparison made me feel more unfavourable to Rabid Grannies, but this one falls short on a lot of fronts. The acting is terrible, and the lousy dubbing from the original French does little to help on that front. It feels inadvertently comic at times. It’s never explained what actually happened to the ‘Rabid Grannies’ for them to turn the way they did, and that would have helped the story along mightily. There are character arcs of sort in place, but they honestly feel like an afterthought there. Given some more weight they might have leant something, but as is this is just a whole lot of screaming and blood and mess. There’s just nothing much to invest in as a viewer, and I can only award this a couple of points for the odd interesting moment. RATING: 2.5/10. I said last week there are good b-movies and bad b-movies, and sadly Rabid Grannies lands itself in that second camp. This one seems to eschew plot for the most part in favour of a series of loosely linked deaths featuring character it’s impossible to care about. I think I’m meant to hate them, but I didn’t even get to a point of feeling that – if it was even the intention. And to top it all off, the grannies of the title are not even rabid at all! Talk about false advertising… there’s nothing here that you won’t have seen done better before or since elsewhere, so this one lands a pretty poor 2.5/10. Killer Condom (1996) Dir. Martin Walz, 107 mins Welcome to Tro-March!
I made it a New Year’s resolution at the start of 2021 to serve up more themed months for Film Gutter this year, and in that spirit I bring you Tro-march! It actually amazed me looking back the Film Gutter output over six years just how few Troma films I’d ever taken a look at – there was Combat Shock, and as far as I can figure that’s it. Which for a movie studio specialising in low-budget, cult and often b-movie horror is pretty surprising. So throughout March I will be doing something to redress that balance with four Troma reviews, kicking off with a look at Killer Condom. It’s well acknowledged I’m a sucker for a quirky or interesting title, so Killer Condom drew me in immediately on those grounds. It’s in German but set in New York – whyever not? – which provides a little bit of an obstacle in the early going, but if you can push past that barrier this one has some value to it. The story follows grizzled, gay New York cop Luigi Mackeroni, who is of Italian descent (the name is a hint, of course) and often cruises the gay club and bar scene in the area. It’s there he meets young Billy, and an unlikely romance is struck up – until their first liaison is broken up by a killer condom munching off one of Luigi’s testicles. Of course his police chief and his partner are incredulous at the suggestion, but for Luigi this has become deeply personal. And when more and more of those violent prophylactics begin emerging into the streets and places of New York, something has to be done – and Luigi is the man to bring the madness to an end, uncovering a plot that runs far deeper than anyone would have expected… I can’t pretend that this one isn’t silly in the extreme, but there’s plenty that I found likeable about it. The lead performance by Udo Samel is hilarious, and he hams up the jaded police officer routine delightfully. The whole police environment in the movie is played for laughs to, being toxicly masculine to the point of parody. The terrifying condoms themselves do look OK effects-wise, bearing in mind this movie is now 25 years old, and of course that central concept provides a few chuckles here and there too. If you’re a fun of ridiculous and overblown B-movies and creature features, you’re bound to get something out of this one. With that said, there are some criticisms I would level. The finale of the movie – while pretty wild to look at – feels a little undercooked in terms of its set-up and comes rather out of nowhere. It’s also not a movie I would really have expected to be 107 minutes long – it feels like the sort of B-movie you could easily blow through in less than 90, and I feel like you could have trimmed some of the smaller subplots to make this tighter and leaner. It’s also maybe a bit uneasy with some of its stereotypes – the Russian mad scientist, the religious zealot and some more besides. I also can’t comment on how accurate its depiction of the gay club and bar scene in New York is, but one or two of those moments didn’t sit quite right. But if you can leave those things aside, Killer Condom is probably one of the better Troma offerings I’ve seen – there is an art to the B-movie for sure, and this one nails an awful lot of it. It’s a fine starting point for Tro-march – and next week we’ll be coming to take a look at a similarly fabulously titled film in Rabid Grannies. RATING: 8/10. This one is a fun little poke at the hardened cop movie, throwing in an element so ridiculous and unbelievable as to be naturally comic. The performances are generally pretty strong, and for all its taking the Michael it feels to me like this movie has a good heart. Silly in droves, but it’s energetic and entertaining and there are plenty of b-movies much worse out there. This one gets a snappy 8/10 from me. UNCLE PECKERHEAD (2020) Dir. Matthew John Lawrence, 97 mins Blimey, 2020? It's really rare that we get much chance to look at anything quite this recent at Film Gutter. Every single year when I do my Top 10 or Top 5 I have to remind everyone that it's for movies reviewed in the last 12 months, not released in the last year. I suppose even now this one would be too late for a 2021 top list, but it's nice to have the luxury of not delving back into the 2000s or earlier for a movie. And today's offering is Uncle Peckerhead, one of those movies that I came to knowing absolutely zilch about. It just looked interesting and fun when it popped up on Sky Cinema, and about in the Film Gutter ball park, so I stuck it on for a watch. And honestly, I'm pleased I did, because this one was pretty damn entertaining. Uncle Peckerhead followed bandmates Judy, Max and Mel, who comprise the punk band Duh!, and they're desperately looking for a break. They finally get the chance to go on a mini-tour around their neck of the country, but sadly they don't have the money or the transport to do it. But in their search for a van to take on the road, they meet Peckerhead, a curious, enigmatic older gentleman who lives in his van and is more than pleased to take Duh! on their travels in search of fame and fortune. All sounds dandy so far, right? There is one slight catch – each night at midnight Peckerhead turns into a devouring, flesh-eating demon with an insatiable appetite. Granted, the phase only last for an unlucky thirteen minutes, but that's long enough for plenty of carnage. And of course, this does prove something of a problem for the band... This one immediately wears its 80s influences on its sleeve, and the whole film is something of a throwback to that time – but certainly a fun one. The personalities of all the main characters were likeable, and their banter and back and forth was always pretty funny. The effects for when Peckerhead turns looked decent, and when we do see it there's enough blood to keep the gorehounds on board without being the most OTT I've ever seen. Strangely this is really quite a sweet story a lot of the way, with the band trying to help Peckerhead, who by day genuinely comes across as pleasant and supportive of the endeavours of the group, who all turn out to be his friends as the story wears on. It wouldn't be the most cutting or extreme movie we've ever looked at, but it does have this out-there feel and calls back to plenty of horror classic with its look and feel. I'm no expert on punk – honestly metal has always been my scene – but the band sounds pretty good and it was nice to see them sort of winning the day in the end, as bittersweet as it ultimately was. They also have a rival band who sound horribly emo – though I might have my music terminology off – and their performance was a comedy highlight in here. Ultimately everything about Uncle Peckerhead felt satisfying. The plot was really solid, the performances were effective and the comedy worked well, which is not always an easy thing to do in a movie like this which blends several elements. It's not an absolute revelation, but as an unusual and sometimes gory slice of quirky horror-comedy it hit all the right beats. I couldn't honestly find any great amount to quibble about without it really hitting the absolute highest of notes. RATING: 8/10. It's nice to sit and watch something so new, and while it pays homage to the past it still feels fresh enough. It may not reinvent the wheel or break boundaries but if you are a fan of horror with a slightly lighter tone – while keeping some of those extravagant bloody flourishes – you ought to have a good time with Uncle Peckerhead. It might not be one that will stick with your forever, but it's a plenty fun way to while away an hour and half or so, and for that reason I'm giving this one an 8/10. RELATED ARTICLESFILM REVIEW : UNCLE PECKERHEADUNCLE PECKERHEAD - AN EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW WITH MATTHEW JOHN LAWRENCEFILM GUTTER REVIEWS: THE BUTCHER (2007)
18/2/2021
THE BUTCHER (2007) Dir. Kim Jin-Won, 75 mins For all the movies from Japan we've been lucky enough to highlight here at Film Gutter, it's actually surprisingly rare that we've ever headed to the nearby shores of South Korea. In fact I think our only viewings from this country have been short films, but today's movie might do something to rectify that. We're bringing the focus now to The Butcher, an extreme horror offering that has a plenty nasty enough reputation to live up to. But will it justify the fuss that has come with it? The movie itself follows two groups – a husband and wife couple unfortunately captured by three people looking to make a snuff movie, and the trio who have captured them in order to make their on-demand 'film' at the behest of a director who calls a number of times. The whole thing itself is about as grim and grimy as you could imagine, with the action being shot either on a handheld camera by the captors or cameras attached to helmets placed on the victims. I will certainly say the second is a nice touch of originality, and something I've not seen before, so I do give some props for that. However that does mean the whole premise of the movie is a real double-edged sword – the production style and design makes it feel almost legitimately like the production of a snuff movie, probably closer than anything barring American Guinea Pig: Bouquet of Guts and Gore. The way the movie is shot does give it a certain sort of authenticity, but with the camera jolting and juddering around all the time it gave me a headache even at its short runtime. It also gives the whole thing a sense of absolute chaos, which is probably what the director was intending, but it is genuinely difficult to tell what's going on numerous times throughout. There's nobody to really care for or care about – the character development is far too rough and ready for that, and even the husband (as the person we come to follow in the main) feels fairly irredeemable by the end of it all. It's maybe a deliberate creative risk to play with that good guy/bad guy standard, but it doesn't land here. There are some genuinely nasty moments – especially when the pig-masked third character enters the fray – but the first half hour or so doesn't really kick into any sort of full gear, which given the short runtime feels a bit egregious. Surely we could have got the ball rolling a bit sooner here, or maybe even cut the runtime? Even at 75 minutes it feels a little overlong for what it is, and I wonder if some of it was improvised because it meanders plenty. I think ultimately this was just too chaotic and too confusing to really get that much out of, and I couldn't really connect with any of the characters to hate them or feel sympathy for them, which severely hampered any emotional impact it was trying to have. If you are really into down and dirty, noisy and in your face horror this could be up your street, but this one didn't really cut it for me. RATING: 5/10. I don't want to go too hard on this one, because I can respect and indeed understand what it is that the director was angling for here. There were little flourishes I liked along the way, but overall the unsteady camera made me feel a little nauseous and rendered a lot of the action really hard to comprehend. The acting wasn't bad – everyone who was captured certainly seemed to be plenty distressed throughout! – but I do feel like the people involved were maybe let down by the script and the overarching story here. This appears to be about the only work by this director, which is kind of a shame, because while this wasn't a slam dunk there were some flourishes here that suggested there could have been better going forward. For all the reservations I had, I do feel like other viewers might get more out of this one than I did, so I'll grade this one a down the middle 5/10. THE REJUVENATOR (1988) |
Archives
February 2022
|
RSS Feed