|
London Gothic by Nicholas Royle (Confingo Publishing, pb , 198pp, £12.99) Review by Mike O’Driscoll Hard to believe that London Gothic is only Royle’s fourth collection, especially given that his first stories appeared in print in the late 1980s. Such was the quality of his work that almost from the start, his stories were being picked up by professional editors and reprinted in years best anthologies, as well as small press titles like Peeping Tom and The 3rd Alternative. It seems that over the last thirty years, half the horror anthologies and year’s best collections I’ve read, have been graced with one of his stories. I can’t claim to have read all his fiction (aside from novels and chapbooks, the internet science fiction database lists over 120 stories in print), but over the years I’ve read quite a few. To encounter a Nicholas Royle story, particularly his best work—for example ‘The Obscure Bird,’ ‘The Proposal’, or ‘Flying into Naples’—is always a delight, albeit usually an unsettling one. To dive headfirst into a collection of his fiction is a different experience entirely. The cumulative effect of these fifteen stories is to cause a sense of disturbance, of being dislocated, not only from mundane reality, but from oneself. When we read stories like ‘Standard Gauge’ or ‘Train, Night’ (trains and railway lines are a recurring motif), we quickly become aware of (and sympathetic to) the quiet desperation of the protagonists, and their desire to subsume themselves into the nascent unrealities that play out around them. That’s to say, we go along with them, even if it leads to violent and unexpected consequences. It’s only afterwards that we ask ourselves, to quote Talking Heads, well, how did I get here? Part of the answer lies in Royle’s understanding of ‘gothic’ not only as a literary mode, but in its relation to art and particularly architecture. The advent of the gothic heralded an increase in secular art and, with the growth of cities and increased trade, the emergence of wealthy patrons commissioning art, and of trade guilds to which painters and artists belonged. Buildings play a crucial role in Royle’s fiction, whether new, repurposed or abandoned, domestic or commercial, and, frequently, no longer there. Houses converted to flats; bars, railway and underground stations, galleries, offices—the places we live and work in, seek out for recreation, move through in search of something; buildings that confine us and which we imbue with meanings known only to ourselves. It’s no coincidence that many of the characters who inhabit these pages and the buildings in them, are themselves artists—film-makers, writers, curators, photographers, actors, people who write about art—striving to make their mark, or, to put it another way, to make their presence known to an otherwise indifferent world. Royle is also acutely aware of the gothic’s reliance on such tropes as isolated settings, and inexplicable, macabre events, as well as its tendency toward emotion, particularly the notion of the sublime, that sensation of being taken outside ourselves. His stories make deft use of these tropes, repurposing—like his converted galleries and studios—the gothic, and the idea of London as a place in which to live and work, for 21st century readers. We begin with a ‘Welcome’, which seems appropriate. The story takes the form of a welcome note left by the former occupants of a flat, for the new owners. The note contains instructions regarding keys, the boiler and waste disposal, but also alludes to the occupants of the other five flats, hinting at strange behaviour and even violence. It’s a slight but amusingly macabre tale that serves as a discordant introduction to what is yet to come. And what does come next is Royle at his most provocative and disconcerting best. ‘Inside/Out’ immediately creates a frisson of anticipation when we learn that the building in which the protagonist has just started work, is close to a similar building in which “Hitchcock had shot scenes from Frenzy … ten years earlier.” Films and filmmakers, particularly Hitchcock and Nicholas Roeg, and characters obsessed with their work, are another theme running through many of these stories. But rather than Frenzy, the film that ‘Inside/Out’ most explicitly references, is Vertigo, not least in the protagonist’s twenty year obsession with former work colleague Judy, who, as the story unfolds, he repeatedly confuses with the similar looking Madeleine. Having recently returned to London after twenty years in Japan, and prompted by the memory of a kiss with Judy, he begins to stalk her. The memory of the kiss is housed in a room in his head “at the top of a house with cream anaglypta wallpaper and stripped floorboards and a sash window” – a room he is outside of but wants to be in. Judy’s house doesn’t seem quite right: it has two exterior doors in walls adjacent to each other, and a photograph in the hall depicts the street on which the house stands, showing the newer block of flats nearby, but not the house itself. Something is out of place. Things—houses, people, songs, language itself—are not where they should be. In Japan, he never properly learned the language, instead picking up phrases from Hitchcock movies dubbed into Japanese. Later, he had learned new Japanese constructions through watching J-Horror films such as Ringu and Audition. He misremembers the track order on Joy Division’s Unknown Pleasures, and it’s significant that two of those mentioned are ‘Disorder’ and ‘I remember nothing’; at times, he feels as though he is living in a movie, and his stalking of Judy seems a deliberate re-enactment of Scottie’s obsession with Madeleine. But Judy is not Judy, or if she is, she’s not where she should be. In what reads like a bizarre Hitchcock/Nakata hybrid, he witnesses Judy/ Madeleine appearing to mimic the behaviour of female ghosts seen in J-horror films. In a room that mirrors the room of his memory, he encounters Hitchcock himself, who taunts him by asking, “Are you conducting a survey,” something the protagonist had earlier claimed to be doing. At the very end, he is, finally, inside, but, one imagines, it is not a place he wanted to be. This sense of being undone by one’s desires is seen again in the narrator of ‘Standard Gauge’, a grifting filmmaker struggling for recognition, working on a film whose central conceit is that everyone who lives in London has, at some time in the past, or will in the future, live in Sinclair Street, near Shepherd’s Bush. Like other strivers in these stories, he’s willing to use others to further his own ambitions, principally Marco, an alienated individual with a thing for the internal layout of houses converted into flats, and an obsession with a lost west London railway line. Marco lives on Sinclair St and hears trains running by on the lost railway line. He has books on Aleister Crowley, and appears fixated on the height of particular women. The narrator also exploits Vita Ray, a young woman willing to pose for nude photographs as a gateway to film work, by drawing her into his scheme to use Marco’s flat for location filming. The story is full of the kind of incidental details that set Royle’s fiction firmly in the real world—the type of people who frequent familiar chain pubs, the demographics of a particular neighbourhood, a concern with property prices—while at the same time acting as a veil behind which lies the possibility of the absurd and grotesque. The narrator gives the appearance of being in control of events, and yet there’s a contradictory sense of complicity, an awareness that he’s allowing himself to be drawn into Marco’s craziness. His own ambition seems, in the end, a necessary part of Marco’s design, a fact that he only begins to understand after the shocking and violent climax, one that leaves us disoriented, struggling to make sense of the lines that go across, and lines that go down. Trains also feature in ‘Train, Night’, a superbly constructed tale of memory and betrayal in which a chance encounter with a stranger, leads to the protagonist devising a bizarre revenge on her ex-lover. The title is a reversal of a 1968 Belgian film, Un Soir, Un Train, that she and Alex had watched shortly after they had got together. She conflates her recollections of the film itself, partly set in London, with her memory of watching trains through a window the first night she and Alex were together, and him telling her how the people in the train had watched them, thinking they looked good together. In retrospect, she wishes she had been one of the passengers on the train, free to disembark at a station and carry on with “a different life,” perhaps the one that Anouk Aimée’s character had gone on to live after she had disappeared. She pictures this other life, with the stranger—Anthony—standing as surrogate for Alex, and stages a macabre re-enactment of a scene from the film, one that serves as a kind of brutal reverse revenge tape. The perception of film plays a key role too in the ominous ‘Necklines through the ages,’ a story that instils a creeping sense of dread as two writers, Tim and Sarah, wander through the rooms of the British galleries at the V&A museum. He is there because he believes the reconstruction of an 18th century room from a Henrietta St house (this being the street where Robert Rusk, the serial killer from Frenzy, occupied a flat), will help inspire an article he is writing on Hitchcock. Tim is envious of Sarah as she has been commissioned to write a piece on author Derek Marlowe, whereas his article is for a non-paying market. Her visit is prompted by the hero of Marlowe’s A Dandy in Aspic, having a collection of porcelain in one of the museum’s vaults. As they each visit separate rooms in the museum, both deliberately imagine, in what Tim calls an act of ‘psychogeography’ characters from Hitchcock’s film, and the film version of A Dandy, inhabiting the same space as themselves. Royle’s disquieting story sees past and present, reality and fantasy collide, as Sarah and Tim become unwitting players in their own movie, pursuing and pursued by the reified figures of Rusk and Alexander Eberlin. Art, the way we perceive (or perhaps misperceive) and the ways in which we consume it, are another preoccupation of many of these stories. The commodification of art is satirised in ‘The Old Bakery’, a scathing and hilarious tale that not only nails the pretentiousness of so many would be artists and artisans, but also skewers the seething resentment of aspiring writers who feel they’ve been shafted by the system. ‘Artefact’ takes the trope of found footage familiar from movies like Paranormal Activity and Rec, and does something unique with it, blending recordings of an old TV show with what may be home movie footage to create a sinister story with particularly nightmarish implications. As well as containing a brilliant joke about gallery visitors at the expense of Last Year at Marienbad, ‘Empty Boxes’ serves as a weird homage to London’s lost cinemas. Simon’s obsession is not with where a film was shot so much as where it was first exhibited in London. He maps their locations across the city, and at the point at which the lines that link them intersect, he finds a gallery that may prove the locus of another, vanished picture house whose very essence he hopes to capture for his collection. ‘Trompe l’oeil’ is an intense and unnerving example of Royle’s ability to wrong-foot his readers, to take them outside of themselves. Again, it’s set in the world of art, focusing on three individuals, the editor, writer and designer of a contemporary art journal. The writer, Toby, believes he is being stalked by a woman who repeatedly visits the same exhibitions that he does, signing the visitor’s book a few names above his. The editor, somewhat flippantly, tries to assuage his fears. The story explicitly mentions a trompe l’oeil, and contains within the text two, more subtle examples. The first is a description of an installation that, upon exiting, gives the visitor “the shock of your life”; the narrator’s description is so vivid we can almost experience it ourselves, only for him to withhold what it is that is most shocking. And in another nod to Hitchcock—and perhaps Brian De Palma—there’s another visual deceit being pulled, not only on poor Toby, but, in the denouement, on the reader. There’s a Brexit story—‘The Vote’—which reads like a cross between Don’t Look Now and Fawlty Towers, and a tale, ‘Guys’, that updates the idea of serial killer tourist trails—as in the Jack the Ripper tours of Whitechapel—to accommodate Denis Nilsen. But among a collection of powerful stories, the real standout is ‘L0nd0n’—that’s London with zeroes replacing the Os—a story at the centre of which is a mise en abîme, a technique in visual art in which a painting or photograph contains a smaller copy of itself, or in literary terms, a story within a story. On the surface, this is the story of an editor, Nick (the name is suggestive), securing the work of a new writer and editing his novel which is about “London …about despair … and holes in the fabric of reality that may or may not exist.” It is also about maps “and spies” that aren’t important. Whether or not this is true of Ian’s novel is never clear—it’s also beside the point, because Royle’s story is about all of these things. The two zeroes in the story’s title may signify emptiness, or the double zero of despair, or they may be the holes through which the narrator is increasingly drawn from the reality in which he shares a flat with girlfriend Jane, to one in which Jane is simply a mannequin and his best friend Joe Cross (a writer whose stories seem to overlap with Royle’s) is dead, his identity supplanted by Ian’s. And of course, this being a story marginally about spies, specifically a Bond minus his final digit, we have to ask who it is being spied upon. As in ‘Trompe l’oeil’, there’s an explicit instance of an artistic technique but its appearance comes immediately after a temporal disruption, one in which Nick may (or may not) have fallen through one of those holes in reality. Like a sleight-of-hand artist, Royle constantly misdirects the reader, to the extent that the truth of what is really going on remains just out of reach. The mise en abîme of a photograph of a red vase positioned next to the vase is echoed in the physical similarity of Ian and Joe Cross, and again in Nick’s dressing the mannequin in his absent girlfriend’s clothes. Another scene has Nick observe through the kitchen window, a couple in the next flat washing the dishes together, just as he and Jane are doing. The question of what’s significant in the story is constantly up for grabs. As if sensing the waning attention of the reader when confronted with an unnecessarily detailed description of some cabling in a subway, Nick (or Royle), disrupts the fourth wall when he addresses us directly: ‘Go ahead. Skim. I’m just telling you what I saw. It might be important. It might not.’ Nick tries to locate the premises of a map-making firm called Geographia, which in Ian’s novel forms part of an “espionage sub-plot”, even though he’s unconvinced of its importance to the meaning of the novel. Maybe what the story is suggesting is that everything has already been told—individuals are conflated or erased, events are duplicated, behaviours mirrored, the same tricks deployed, old texts plagiarised. Individual experience is not unique, we make no difference, we fade away without having made an impression and we do not understand why. Ultimately, ‘L0nd0n’ may be the perfect embodiment of the gothic story; it is a story about the story within itself, one that hides in plain sight, while at the same time remaining unknowable. Cumulatively, the stories in London Gothic, map out our contemporary anxieties, our fragile sense of who we are as individuals and as a society, that sense of disruption and fragmentation made explicit by Brexit and Covid. These are stories that speak to, even ‘infect’ each other, like virulent examples of mise en abîme: perhaps ‘The Old Bakery’s pretentious artist and would be novelist ,Willet, is working on ‘Trompe l’oiel’; maybe the novel that Ian from ‘L0nd0n’ is writing is a version of ‘Empty Boxes’; perhaps the found footage in ‘Artefact’ was staged and shot by the jilted female protagonist of ‘Train, Night’; is it possible that Judy’s house in ‘Inside/Out’ is an installation visited by the unstable editor of ‘Trompe l’oeil’? Using his own interest in films, contemporary art, London architecture and neighbourhoods, trains, gentrification, and flaneurs, Royle unpicks our own obsessions with identity and how we present ourselves to (and are perceived by) others; with status, particularly as it relates to work and property (he’s very funny when writing about house prices and estate agents) and art with a capital ‘A’ and people who write about it. This may sound like another manifestation of the typically British literary trait of writers writing fiction about writers, but the reality is Royle is mercilessly taking the piss, and doing so from the vantage point of one on the margins. He’s not a mainstream literary figure, operating as he does within the borders of horror/fantasy fiction, but his stories have always had a distinctly ‘literary’ bent. And like Moorcock or Samuel Delany, he’s not embarrassed by genre—he actively embraces it, citing fantasists such as Ramsey Campbell and M. John Harrison, as well as marginal figures like Derek Marlowe and BS Johnson. It might seem a stretch to suggest that a collection of stories in which tricks of the eye, decaying architecture, old films, and lost railways, should speak to us of contemporary universal anxieties, but somehow, these stories do just that. It has something to do with the manner in which we use all of these to distract us from the things that really frighten us—the sense of having little control over our lives, the very real possibility that the centre has broken and things really are falling apart. Loneliness, insanity, lovelessness, purposelessness, obliteration, are all just around the corner, and the truth is that we can’t bear to think about them. And yet, as Royle—a unique stylist and teller of genuinely unsettling stories—demonstrates, we do. Mike O’Driscoll London Gothic: Short Stories |
Archives
May 2023
|












RSS Feed